Call Your Credit Card Companies

Image via Wikipedia

If you are not aware of this you need to be.

Since the global financial markets went into a tailspin last September, credit card companies have taken it upon themselves to cancel your credit cards without discussion or warning.

So, if you have a zero balance, and think you are being so responsible by doing that - and you are - some credit card companies have just decided to cancel those cards.

Why? Well, they have a host of reasons. But whatever they may be, what I want to know is that since for the most part, people work very hard to maintain a good credit record, and work very hard to have access to affordable credit, then 1) why are these companies not required to discuss this matter of cancellation with you and 2) why is there not a process for appeal or review?

Today's Wall Street Journal did a nice short piece on this: Credit Card Issuers: Buy Something Or Else! I submit it is well worth your time to read these few paragraphs.

Now, if you are not concerned, you should be.

Credit cards serve some very useful functions. For example:

• They provide access to funds when you have none - albeit at a price. Hence, you should always have one for emergencies
  
• For many services like a rental car or a hotel room, you must provide a credit card to secure the room and also in the event of incidentals.
  
• Credit cards allow remote purchases via the phone and internet.

So, they are very useful. I just insist that prudent money management necessitates that credit card use must be moderated and managed.

Let's talk a bit about your credit rating. A good credit rating gives you access to credit, and access to lower rates. Did you know that when your credit cards are canceled, your credit rating could be negatively affected? Your credit score is determined by your debt relative to credit available. So when a card is canceled, your available credit falls.

Oh, and by the way, if you are depending on your rewards from any card - zero balances or not - you need to rethink that. Check out CNBC's article today: Credit Card Firms Slash Rewards To Cushion Losses

My two cents? Go call your credit card companies. Decide which cards you want to keep. And then if you must make small purchases regularly to keep those cards that you have zero balances on, you may want to consider doing so to keep your credit lines open. But make sure you don't sacrifice your debt management for it. And as for the 'by the way" with the rewards, I'd use 'em before I lose 'em.

A Quick Way To Have More Money Immediately

Image by spacebahr via Flickr

I came across this blog post, and I thought it was so powerful I decided to share the link rather than share the tip within in.

Kudos to the author. It's so simple but so true.

Read this short post: One Thing You Can Do Today That Will Put You In Better Financial Shape Tomorrow

Now maybe you can't go a whole day without spending, but trying giving up one item that you would normally buy regularly, if you can. It's a great way to start.

Everything you save and don't spend, you can earn interest on it. That's more money for you.

Everything you don't buy on credit, does not cost you interest on savings foregone and does not increase your costs by debt interest incurred. That's more money for you.

Guess What Americans Are Doing? Saving More!

Image by Daniel Y. Go via Flickr

Today's news was interesting. In the last few months, there has been a steady increase in savings rate in the US. At one point in recent years, it had been negative. See an article here in the New York Times: Consumers Increase Savings While Spending Less

So, I'm thinking this is great news!

After the recent financial crisis and given the ongoing uncertainty, people are making sure that they are more conservative with their money, doing the absolute basic minimum of personal finance which is making sure that they have adequate savings, and really making substantial steps to get themselves back on their feet.

However, some economists argue that when people save "too much", the economy takes long to recover because businesses need the revenue to employ people etc. OK, I see the point. But, consider this:

There is nothing wrong with saving. Saving is the absolute basic minimum of personal finance. You don't have to invest (which is to take on risk with the hope or expectation of a return). You don't have to borrow (which is to take on debt). But you do have to have money to spend for the basic necessities of life and that comes from earning and saving.

If you want to get higher returns than what you can get from savings, and are willing to take the risk of losing all your money, then you invest.

Saving is not investing. I repeat, saving is not investing.

Saving is what you do when you place a deposit with a regulated financial institution at a stated interest rate applicable to that deposit and that deposit is insured up to a limit by a Government agency (such as the FDIC in the US and the JDIC in Jamaica)

If you want to buy things that cost more than your income, then you borrow and pay a premium for that money not being yours. That is what debt is - other people's money and you are using it. If you can wait, it is better to save for an item than go into debt to buy it. Why? Because debt costs money. That money is called interest and that debt interest will in most cases - unless it is concessionary debt - exceed your after tax interest on savings dollar for dollar. So after all your time spent saving, you would be effectively losing some of that interest every time you use any form of credit.

Now, back to this debate between savings and economic recovery.

Now, as I understand it, in the US people lost the ability to access credit - many of them through no fault of their own. If you don't have your own money - which is savings - and you don't have credit - either because of the banking crisis, the new lending standards of the bank, the credit rating system, or because you owe too much money - then what are you going to use to consume? You need savings.

Massive borrowing fueled unsustainable levels of consumption. Would some economists prefer that the economy "recover" by people borrowing which they might not be able to do anyway? Would some economists prefer that other people - who are fearing job losses - use up their savings to consume? Because when those savings are depleted, people will have no money to consume, and will have no savings and possibly employment income to qualify for credit to then consume. At some point, the economy will run out of people who have money to consume.

Why, in this time of record job losses, and market uncertainty should people not save more? Now, I love consumption as much as the next person but I have zero interest in unsustainable consumption. Unsustainable consumption, unsustainable debt with limited, zero or negative saving is how we ended up in this global mess.

No matter how you look at it, consumption gets a hit.

In order for an economy to be sustainable, there has to be a balance between consumption and saving.

We cannot continue to live in an interconnected global economy with such great information asymmetry - where so many people do not understand the basics of personal finance:

• that savings are absolutely mandatory;
  
• that savings are NOT investments;
  
• that you have to evaluate investments not just based on hot tips or recommendations but based on your individual risk profile, needs and age in life;
  
• that debt eats away at your hard earned interest and needs to be managed
• that you should only take on debt in accordance with your realistic ability to repay, and fully cognizant of the true cost of debt
  
• that expenses (and hence consumption) must be managed so that they can be paid from earnings without depleting savings, savings goals and ability to save. Remember the "Pay Yourself First" principle, you must save before you do anything else!
  

I could go on.

In order for anyone to prosper, as we have seen, everybody needs to be at a basic minimum level and it is up to education reform, advocacy, and helping each other that this financial literacy will be achieved. It has to start from a very young age.

If you spend money, you must know how to have money to spend - that is, to save.

It is said that those who weathered the Great Depression were the conservative spenders and the aggressive savers. Although we are not in a Depression, we would sure like to avoid one. The only thing we are certain of is that we are living with uncertainty. And if you don't know if and how much money you are likely to earn in the immediate near future, isn't it prudent to adopt some conservative spending and aggressive saving habits?

Plan to Take Action in 2009

Image via Wikipedia

I remember watching the opening bell on the first day of trading. Trading is a speculative activity, involving risk with the hope of reward.

And here was perhaps the most famous personal finance expert/author, Suze Orman - someone who counsels about money management, the virtues of saving, the importance of managing debt, and taking risks only when you have evaluated them, understand them and can do so depending on your age and stage in life - doing the honors.

It was a very interesting note to start the year. And to me it signaled that this should be the year of financial literacy, and greater risk/reward determination, and ultimately responsibility.

About Economy
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost